Administrative Justice

TEXT 1

Read the text paying special attention to the most important definitions.

I. Warming up

1. Answer the following questions:

1) What is the task of administrative judiciary?

What powers does it have?

2)

3) Do you agree with the saying by H. L. Mencken (1880 - 1956), U.S. journalist, critic, and editor: “A judge is a law student who marks his own examination papers”? Why (not)?

2. Match the following English words and expressions with their Ukrainian equivalents:

1 1	forfeiture of licenses	a	Розрізняти
2 2	to be vested with	b	Законність
3 3	validity	c	мати право
4 4	contested cases	d	позбавлення ліцензії
5 5	to issue	e	спірні справи
6 6	to distinguish	f	Підлягати
7 7	incur	j	Видавати

3. How are the letters in bold pronounced in the following words? Choose the correct variant.

au thority [ә] [au]

r a ther [æ] [a]

d ea l [iә] [i:]

s ou ght [ә:] [әu]

v io lations [iә] [aiә]

Administrative Justice, or, more commonly, administrative adjudication, is the exercise by an administrative agency of judicial powers delegated to the agency by a legislative body.

Agencies typically possess both legislative and judicial powers in their area of authority. The legislative power gives the agency the authority to issue regulations, and the judicial power gives the agency the authority to adjudicate contested cases within its area of jurisdiction.

Administrative courts are not ordinarily engaged in determining the rights and duties of individuals as against other individuals. Rather, they typically deal with individuals in relation to government in terms of benefits sought or disabilities incurred from government action. It is this function that chiefly distinguishes administrative tribunals from civil courts. In contrast to the criminal courts, administrative tribunals are typically empowered to assess various penalties, such as forfeiture of licenses for the violation of a statutory or administrative regulation. Some administrative agencies, however, are not vested with adjudicative powers and must proceed through the regular courts for civil or criminal punishment of violations.

Another fundamental difference between administrative tribunals and courts is the nature of subject matter jurisdiction. The subject matter of an agency's administrative regulation and adjudication is normally a single economic activity, a set of closely related economic activities, or specific benefits conferred by government. The concern of the National Labor Relations Board with labor relations is an example of the first; the jurisdiction of the Federal Communications Commission over radio, television, and telephone exemplifies the second; and adjudication of the validity of benefit claims by such agencies as the Veterans Administration represent the third. In contrast, the subject matter jurisdiction of courts embraces a broad spectrum of civil and criminal law.

Дата добавления: 2014-11-20