Clauses of Result

Clauses of result or consequence will also exemplify the synsemantic character of syntactic structures. Their formal arrangement is characterised by two patterns:

1) clauses included by the conjunction that correlated with the pronoun such or the pronoun so in the main clause;

2) clauses included by phrasal connective so that.

Her misery was so terrible that she pinned on her hat, put on her jacket and walked out of the flat like a person in a dream. (Mansfield)

He did not however neglect to leave certain matters to future considerations, which had necessitated further visits, so that the little back room had become quite accustomed to his spare not unsolid but unobtrusive figure... (Galsworthy)

Variation in the lexico-grammatical organisation of such clauses is generally associated with variation in their meaning.

Instances are not few, for instance, when a clause of result is suggestive of the degree or the state of things indicated by the main clause. The moaning of such clauses is always made clear by contextual indication.

Examples of such clauses of result are:

The moon had passed behind the oak-tree now, endowing it with uncanny life, so that it seemed watching him — the oak-tree his boy had been so fond of climbing, out of which he had once fallen and hurt himself, and hadn't cried! (Galsworthy)

When he told her that he would take care of her so that nothing evil should befall, she believed him fully. (Dreiser)

Structural synonyms of sub-clauses of result presented by infinitival phrases may be illustrated by such patterns as:

It was too wonderful to be anything but a delirium. (London)

{Syn. It was so wonderful that it could be anything but a delirium).

A woodpecker's constant tap was the only sound, for the rain was not heavy enough for leaf-dripping to have started. (Galsworthy)

(Syn.... the rain was not so heavy that...).

Then, just when they were old enough to go to school, her husband's sister came to stop with them to help things along... (Mansfield)

(Syn. Then, just when they were so old that they could go to school,..).

Clauses of Purpose

The grammatical organisation of sub-clauses of purpose does not take long to explain.

What merits consideration here is the syntactic organisation of the constituents of the complex sentence and the verb-forms in the structure of predication.

Clauses expressing purpose are known to be introduced by the conjunction that or lest and by the phrase in order that.

That has, perhaps, no rivals among connectives. It is well known to have a particularly wide range of structural meanings, but no ambiguity arises in actual usage. As always in language, the context will remove in each case all the other significations, as potentially implicit in that which in subordination may do the duty of a relative pronoun and a conjunction.

Purpose clauses introduced by that may be illustrated by the following examples:

... she had softly moved her chair into its present place: partly as it seemed from an instinctive consciousness that he desired to avoid observation: and partly that she might, unseen by him, give some vent to the natural feelings she had hitherto suppressed. (Dickens)

And lest the sun should break this charm too eagerly, there moved between him and the ground a mist like that which waits upon the moon on summer nights... (Dickens)

Infinitival phrases implying purpose relations are commonplace. Familiar examples are:

This action has been brought by the plaintiff to recover from the defendant the sum of three hundred and fifty pounds, alleged by the plaintiff to have been fixed by this correspondence... (Galsworthy)

She made a movement to cross into the traffic.

Clauses of Concession

Sub-clauses of concession with all their grammatical complexity and variety of syntactic patterning as well as their synsemantic character will engage our attention next. The component grammatical meanings in sentence-patterns of this kind are often not so clear-cut as it might be suggested.

It is very important to distinguish between the following types of concessive sub-clauses:

a) clauses giving the information about the circumstances despite or against which what is said in the principal clause is carried out:

Though she did not know it, she had a feeling in him of proprietary right. (London)

I always understood you did so as a form of expiation, even though you had asked Dinny to marry you. (Galsworthy)

b) clauses which give some additional information associated with the content of the principal clause, the idea of concession in such patterns is somewhat weakened.

He mopped his forehead dry and glanced about him with a controlled face, though in the eyes there was an expression such as wild animals betray when they fear the trap. (London)

c) clauses with overlapping relationship. In patterns of this type there is a suggestion of the secondary adversative meaning:

He extracted great happiness from squelching her, and she squelched easily these days, though it had been different in the first years of their married life. (London)

Complex sentences of this kind are on the borderline between subordination and coordination; though might be easily replaced by the adversative conjunction but.

d) inserted and parenthetical concessive clauses are more or less independent syntactic units and are generally set off by a comma, colon or semi-colon, e. g.:

Shannon was not a financier, neither was Steger. They had to believe in away, though they doubted it, partly — particularly Shannon. (Dreiser)

... but being a Forsyte, though not yet quite eight years old, he made no mention of the thing at the moment dearest to his heart... (Galsworthy)

The conjunction though may introduce independent sentences.

I've got a father; I kept him by alive during the war, so he's bound to keep me now. Though, of course, there's the question whether he ought to be allowed to hang on to his property. (Galsworthy)

It will be observed, in passing, that concessive relations are, in point of fact, logically associated with causal and resultative meaning, the latter being to some extent inseparably present in any sub-clause of this type.

The implication of pure concession is fairly prominent in prepositive sub-clauses included by although, though (often intensified by nevertheless in the principal clause).

Although he was dealing privately for Edward Butler as an agent, and with the same plan in mind, and although he had never met either Mollemhauer or Simpson, he nevertheless felt that in so far as the manipulation of the city loan was concerned he was acting for them. (Dreiser)

Clauses of concession introduced by though and even though have much in common with sub-clauses introduced by if and even if.

The more cautious members of Chicago society, even if they did not

attend, then, would hear, and then would come ultimate comment and decision. (Dreiser)

If all the world hated you, and believed you wicked, while your own conscience approved you, and absolved you from guilt, you would not be without friends. (Brontë)

Intensity of concessive meaning is generally produced by putting the nominal parts or the adverbial adjunct at the head of the sentence.

Young though she will always seem to me, she is...

Similarly, in sentence-patterns with the conjunction as:

Taking his glass from the table, he held it away from him to scrutinise the colour; thirsty as he was, it was not likely that he was going to drink thrush. (Galsworthy)

Crafty and cruel as his face was at the best of times, though it was a sufficiently fair face as to form and regularity of feature, it was at its worst when he set forth on this errand. (Dickens)

Harmless as this speech appeared to be, it acted on the traveller's distrust, like oil on fire. (Dickens)

Much as I admire the film, I'll not go to see it again.

Note. The conjunction though may stand at the end of a simple sentence, following another simple sentence, closely connected in sense. In such end-position though will be synonymous with nevertheless, nonetheless, all the same, e. g.:

He did not tell me where he had been, but I knew though (= but I knew all the same).

In sentences introduced by the conjunction as there is sometimes a fairly prominent suggestion of causal relations.

Uncommunicative as he was, some time elapsed before I had an opportunity of changing his mind. (Brontë)

Concessive clauses may be introduced by the phrasal conjunction for all that:

And Jon could not help knowing too, that she was still deeply in love with him for all that they had been married two years. (Galsworthy)

A special type of complex sentences is presented by patterns with concessive sub-clauses suggestive of the secondary alternative meaning. Here belong clauses introduced by however, whoever, whatever, whenever, wherever and such phrasal conjunctions as no matter what, no matter how.

Examples are:

"I doubt if Wilfred will go before the Committee", said Michael, gloomily. "Fleur confirmed him".

"Of course he won't, Michael".

"Then what will happen?"

"Almost certainly he'll be expelled under rule whatever it is. (Galsworthy)

The public would never hear his name, no matter how big the case was. (Carter)

No matter what the others may say, I shall have my own way.

The secondary alternative meaning in clauses of this kind is so prominent that some grammarians are inclined to identify them as a special type of subordination. Such is, for instance, Jespersen's point of view

in Essentials of English Grammar where these clauses are classified as "clauses of indifference"¹.

Mention must also be made of reduced sub-clauses of concession that 'are not infrequent both in informal spoken English and literary prose.

Their abode, though poor and miserable, was not so utterly wretched as in the days when only good Mrs. Brown inhabited it. (Dickens)

His wife, whatever her conduct, had clear eyes and an almost depressing amount of common sense. (Galsworthy)

...His case was different from that of the ordinary Englishman as chalk from cheese. But whatever his case, he was not a man to live with. (Galsworthy)

Concessive relations overlapping with alternative meaning find their linguistic expression in syntactic patterns with functional transpositions of the Imperative Mood forms, e. g.:

Say what you may (might) I shall have my own way.

Try what you will (would) there is no helping here.

Say what one will, to take the love of a man like Cowperwood away from a woman like Aileen was to leave her high and dry on land, as a fish out of its native element... (Dreiser)

Economise as he would, the earnings from hack-work did not balance expenses. (London)

Attention must also be drawn to the use of verb-forms in concessive sub-clauses, which naturally vary depending on the context. The Indicative Mood is fairly common in all types of clauses implying concession, Present and Past tense-forms, in particular. The Subjunctive Mood is common in complex sentences with hypothetical concession.

Concessive clauses may be included by the conjunction while which in such patterns comes to function parallel with though (although).

While he was yet in unspeakable agonies, the dwarf renewed their conversation. (Dickens)

Concessive relations may also be expressed by such patterns with verbless predicatives as:

How could you behave like that, and your mother present there? (→ though your mother was present there).

Moist as was his brow, tremble as did his hand once after the nameless fright, he was still flushed with fumes of liquor. (Dreiser)

Intensity and emphasis can also be produced by inversion in such patterns as:

Wait as he did, however, Carrie did not come. (Dreiser)

Дата добавления: 2014-12-29