Added or diminished emphasis on flagged targets

Number of Category A and B traitors on Western Europe

Category D individuals

Category C traitor

Category C traitors are less influential and lower priority targets (often individuals who have facilitated category A and B traitors) but who are still guilty of charges 1-8.

10 000 per 1 million citizens.

Punishment: fines, incarceration, expropriation (considered as acceptable indirect casualties in larger operations where WMDs are involved).

Category D individuals have little or no political influence but are facilitating category B and C traitors and/or MA100 political parties/media companies through various means. They are not guilty of charges 1-8 but work with or for individuals who are. The classification is of relevance when calculating/estimating indirect casualties concerning larger operations where WMDs are involved, as any category D individuals is not considered an innocent “civilian” but rather as a secondary servant/facilitator.

20 000-30 000 per 1 million citizens

Punishment: none (not considered civilian)

There are approximately 400 000 category A and B traitors in Western Europe using the current classification system (1010 per million).

France	65 650
Germany	82 820
United Kingdom	62 216
Netherlands	16 665
Belgium	10 807
Sweden
Austria
Norway
Switzerland
Luxembourg
Spain	47 167
Italy	60 600
Portugal	10 807
Denmark
Ireland
Greece	11 312
Finland
Iceland
Cyprus
Malta

This term can be used internally within any conservative military order (not that any cell in Phase 1 should be larger than 2 individuals).

Temporary Immunity (diminished emphasis)

”Temporary immunity” is abbreviated TI and the level of significance ranges from 1-3. F example: TI1 indicates insignificant anti-Islamisation principles implemented, and where TI3 indicates considerable anti-Islamisation principles implemented. This type of temporary immunity can be ”awarded” to cultural Marxist/multiculturalist political parties, organisations and individuals who have shown indications of policy shift.

- TI1 Insignificant anti-Islamisation principles implemented (TI declined)

- TI2 Some butminimal anti-Islamisation principles implemented (TI declined)

- TI3 Considerable anti-Islamisation principles implemented (TI granted)

No attacks should occur on TI3 candidates in phase 1. As for TI1-2 candidates, even though immunity has not been granted, any Justiciar Knight should consider other targets if possible. If there aren’t any equivalent targets which would yield the desired result, then TI-1-2 targets would still be the logical choice.

If the policy shift is significant enough over a long period permanent status change may be applied.

Focus Target (added emphasis)

”Focus Target” is abbreviated FT and indicates targets who will yield added results (high value targets) or can be used to flag ”unforgivable” political parties, organisations or individuals who has or still are committing grave crimes.

- FT1 Above average crimesor above average target/value

- FT2 Higher…

- FT3 Highest…

Дата добавления: 2015-05-31