Policy methods are ways of influence and the use of its means.Among them violent and nonviolent methods, compulsion and belief are allocated

The question on influence of the purposes and means for a policy being long since is a subject of hot discussions basically representatives of three points of view: moral character of a policy is defined by its purpose; priority influence on the moral importance of a policy is rendered by used means; both the purpose, and means are equally important for giving to the politician of humane character, and they should be commensurable with each other and with a concrete situation.

The most known supporters “целедоминирующего” the approach were N.Makiavelli and Vladimir Ilich Lenin ( 1870-1924 ). But the thesis has "the end justifies the means received a detailed theoretical substantiation and a practical embodiment at Jesuits - members of the Catholic award based in 1534 in Paris and operating and until now. Many centuries in public thought the opinion prevailed that for noble purpose achievement immoral means, for example, lie use are admissible also. The lie, information concealment, gathering and creation of compromising materials and in the world of a modern policy is considered quite admissible means of political confrontation though the political science and public opinion disapprove of it.

“Средстводоминирующий” the approach to a parity of the purposes and means of a policy starts with a moral priority of means over the purpose that characterises, first of all, supporters of a nonviolence in the politician. Mahatma Gandi (1869 - 1948) considered that the morals are embodied in a reality through means used in the politician for they express moral will of the person.

"The compromise" approach to a parity of the purposes and policy means recognises that these components play it, the politician, an own and important role. Convincing enough treatment of the general parity of the purposes and means in the politician from the point of view of its moral estimation was formulated by Nikolay Aleksandrovich Berdjaev ( 1874-1948 ): “the Purpose leaves in an abstract distance, means remain a direct reality. When apply malicious means opposite to the purposes the purpose never reach, all replace with means and about the purpose forget or they turn to pure rhetoric. The purpose makes sense only in the event that it to start to carry out now, here”.

VI. The Violence represents the deliberate action which is directed on destruction of the person or drawing to it of a damage and carried out contrary to its will. The political violence differs from other forms not only physical compulsion and possibility to deprive the person of freedom, to life or to put it irreparable physical injuries, but also organisation, width,

Дата добавления: 2014-01-04