Introduction. Validation of a model-based virtual trials method for tight glycemic control in intensive care

Validation of a model-based virtual trials method for tight glycemic control in intensive care

J. Geoffrey Chase, Fatanah Suhaimi, Sophie Penning, Jean-Charles Preiser, Aaron J. Le Compte, Jessica Lin, Christopher G. Pretty, Geoffrey M. Shaw, Katherine T. Moorhead and Thomas Desaive

Stress-induced hyperglycemia and high levels of insulin resistance are prevalent in critical care [1-4]. Increased counter-regulatory hormone secretion stimulates endogenous glucose production and increases insulin resistance [3,4], elevating equilibrium glucose levels and reducing the amount of glucose the body can utilize with a given amount of insulin. Hyperglycemia worsens outcomes, increasing the risk of severe infection, myocardial infarction, and critical illness polyneuropathy and multiple organ failure.

The occurrence of hyperglycemia, particularly severe hyperglycemia, is associated with increased morbidity and mortality [2]. Glycemic variability and poor control are independently associated with increased mortality [5-7]. Van den Berghe et al [8,9] showed that tight glucose control (TGC) reduced intensive care unit (ICU) patient mortality up to 45% using a target of 6.1 mmol/L. Other studies with similar or slightly higher targets have successfully reduced mortality [10,11]. Hence, despite some difficulty repeating these results [12], the data indicate that a control algorithm that safely provides TGC to reduce hyperglycemia and glycemic variability can reduce mortality and cost [13,14].

In this study, "virtual trials" are performed using a clinically validated model [15-17] of the glucose-insulin system. Insulin sensitivity, SI, is used as the critical marker of a patient's metabolic state and is assumed independent of the insulin and nutrition inputs. Virtual trials can be used to simulate a TGC protocol using a SI(t) profile identified hourly from clinical data and different insulin and nutrition inputs. Virtual trials enable the rapid testing of new TGC intervention protocols, as well as analysis with respect to glycemic control protocol performance, safety from hypoglycaemia, clinical burden, and the ability to handle dynamic changes in patient metabolic state [15,18]. They are thus a means of safely optimising protocols prior to clinical implementation.

[Some details are omitted]

Thus, the performance of virtual trials on separate matched cohorts has not yet been evaluated. In addition, the assumption of the independence of a virtual patient's insulin sensitivity SI(t) profile from the insulin and nutrition inputs used to identify it from clinical blood glucose (BG) data has never been validated. This study tests these assumptions using clinically matched (virtual) cohorts based on clinical data from an independent ICU, who were treated with two different glycemic control protocols in a randomised trial. The independence of the ICU ensures a cohort who may be different in treatment, insulin sensitivity or other factors [25] from patients in the Christchurch ICU whose data underlie the development of the models and methods [16,19-21] validated in this study. Hence, there is no link between the patients used in this study and the development of the models and methods being tested here. Hence, these clinically matched cohorts allow this assumption of independence to be tested, as well as the assessment of model errors in this virtual trial approach.

Дата добавления: 2014-10-31