B. The Western European multiculturalist regimes subsidise multiculturalist newspapers

Demonisation and Use of Language

Negative Responses

Western European multiculturalist regimes actively put their policies across by using their loyal subjects the MSM, briefings, interviews and publications.

It is impossible to effectively criticize the multiculturalist MSM hegemony as they make out 98% of the news companies and control 95% of the news distribution in Western Europe. Alternative news distribution on the internet (5% and increasing) is under attack as well and it is likely that new EUSSR “hate laws” will make it illegal to criticise multiculturalism and Islam in the future.

"There are certain facts and stories from Korea that editors and publishers have printed which were pure fabrications... Many of us who sent the stories knew they were false, but we had to write them because they were official releases from responsible military headquarters and were released for publication even though the people responsible knew they were untrue."

Robert C Miller, United Press correspondent during the Korean War.

Nationalists/conservatives are always portrayed in a de-humanising manner.

Dissident views are undermined by demonising the people or organisations that have these views.

Smear campaign describing right wing dissidents as “Fascist Geert”, etc. is common on a pan-European, national and local level. The views of patriots/nationalists are always undermined by depicting them as freaks (negative highlights from their past will be used, or will be created).

Certain phrases are used to hide or distort dissident views. Dissident views are described as extreme and those who hold these views as extremists. Others are labelled as racists, fascists, Nazis, conspiracy theorists, militants or other disparaging names. Their views are meant to be ignored and are rarely argued against coherently.

When persecution is undertaken and intensified in the future by the Western European multiculturalist regimes, the opponents are demonised and the action justified by using a phrase such as: War on Fascism

Forces resisting the illegal Western European multiculturalist regimes are described as terrorists or right wing extremists. The phase indigenous resistance, resistance fighter is never as this would indicate a general resistance to the multiculturalist regimes.

People should be aware of the methods used by the Western European cultural Marxist/multiculturalist regimes covertly subsidises its propaganda channels; the MSM (mainstream media). The so called “free press” in Western Europe is a myth and has never existed, despite our regimes unwavering efforts to tell us that this is the case. In many (if not all) Western European countries, only newspapers who support multiculturalism receives subsidy by the national regime and this has often been the case since the ideology of cultural Marxism/multiculturalism was implemented in the 50s, 60s or 70s (depending on country). For Norway and Sweden it has existed since the 70s.

The following overview documents how the multiculturalist regime in Norway subsidises multiculturalist propaganda newspapers (MSM) under an arrangement which can only resemble that of the former USSR. And yet, the Western European regimes dare calling themselves democratic. All newspaper opposing or critical of multiculturalism has by default lost any opportunity to receive the same subsidies resulting in a scenario where they struggle to provide efficient distribution for their products and thus for the marketing of their world view. The end result of this policy is that all media companies feel inclined to adapt to and adopt a multiculturalist view (a majority adapted to and adopted the “state view” during the 70s and 80s). These state subsidy arrangements is one of several reasons why there are now extremely few newspapers in Western Europe who are critical of multiculturalism. In many countries, such as Norway and Sweden, there isn’t a single newspaper representing the cultural conservatives…! The following guide illustrates how the Norwegian cultural Marxist/multiculturalist regime undemocratically subsidises the MSM to ensure that they remain loyal and forward the globalist/cultural Marxist/multiculturalist world view of the Norwegian Labour Party. I have not been able to create similar overviews for all Western European countries but I know similar practices exist in several countries.

The following overview illustrates how the cultural Marxist/multiculturalist elites of Norway fund their propaganda channels:

Newspapers in support of cultural Marxism/multiculti	Daily Distribution (2009)	Direct Subsidy (2009 - Euro)	Indirect Subsidy* (1999 - Euro)
VG	262 374		26 875 000
Aftenposten	243 188		15 750 000
Dagbladet	105 255		15 125 000
Dagsavisen	31 400	4 800 000	1 750 000
Bergens Tidende	83 086		5 250 000
Adresseavisen	75 835		4 625 000
Bergensavisen	29 300	4 200 000	1 750 000
Vårt Land	27 000	4 500 000	1 500 000
Stavanger Aftenblad	65 298		3 625 000
Smaller publications in support of multiculti and other left wing extremist publications receiving direct or indirect financial support from the cultural Marxist/multicultural regime of Norway
Nationen	16 000	3 125 000
Klassekampen	11 400	2 625 000	(Marxist extremist views)
Rogalands Avis	12 500	1 500 000
Dagen	10 700	1 250 000

Дата добавления: 2015-05-31