КАТЕГОРИИ: Архитектура-(3434)Астрономия-(809)Биология-(7483)Биотехнологии-(1457)Военное дело-(14632)Высокие технологии-(1363)География-(913)Геология-(1438)Государство-(451)Демография-(1065)Дом-(47672)Журналистика и СМИ-(912)Изобретательство-(14524)Иностранные языки-(4268)Информатика-(17799)Искусство-(1338)История-(13644)Компьютеры-(11121)Косметика-(55)Кулинария-(373)Культура-(8427)Лингвистика-(374)Литература-(1642)Маркетинг-(23702)Математика-(16968)Машиностроение-(1700)Медицина-(12668)Менеджмент-(24684)Механика-(15423)Науковедение-(506)Образование-(11852)Охрана труда-(3308)Педагогика-(5571)Полиграфия-(1312)Политика-(7869)Право-(5454)Приборостроение-(1369)Программирование-(2801)Производство-(97182)Промышленность-(8706)Психология-(18388)Религия-(3217)Связь-(10668)Сельское хозяйство-(299)Социология-(6455)Спорт-(42831)Строительство-(4793)Торговля-(5050)Транспорт-(2929)Туризм-(1568)Физика-(3942)Философия-(17015)Финансы-(26596)Химия-(22929)Экология-(12095)Экономика-(9961)Электроника-(8441)Электротехника-(4623)Энергетика-(12629)Юриспруденция-(1492)Ядерная техника-(1748) |
Influence and accolades
After a quarter-century of counsel on a range of human affairs, Poor Richard had clearly made an impression on his "middling" contemporaries. In the Autobiography, Franklin modestly accepted credit for spearheading an economic upswing with "The Way to Wealth": "In Pennsylvania, as it discouraged useless expense in foreign Superfluities, some thought, it had its share of Influence in producing that growing Plenty of Money which was observable for several Years after its publication." In a similar vein, Palmeri examines Richard's political impact, especially after 1749, the year Franklin expanded the almanac to create Poor Richard Improved. Besides unifying the calendar poems, he incorporated short essays on scientific and historical themes. The work took on a "strongly Whiggish" flavor, says Palmeri, paying tribute to such Whig luminaries as Locke and Addison and exposing the corruption of the British monarchy. He credits Poor Richard Improved and the politically charged almanacs that succeeded it with shaping the "idea of an American nation and the ideal hardworking citizen of that nation." Chris Looby affirms Richard's far-reaching cultural influence in his biography, Benjamin Franklin. Says Looby, "The proverbs and maxims in Poor Richard's [Almanack] were endlessly quoted and repeated over the years until they became the `common sense' of millions of Americans.... Franklin must be credited, therefore, with forming... a large part of the characteristic outlook and values of a burgeoning popular culture. He was America's first pop philosopher and moralist, the precursor to such men as Mark Twain and Horatio Alger." Poor Richard's aura prevailed through the American Revolution and beyond, as evidenced by an accolade bestowed upon him by John Paul Jones. The famed naval fighter christened his warship Bonhomme Richard, the sobriquet by which Poor Richard was fondly known to the French. Given this hold on the sensibilities of a newborn nation, Poor Richard and his famous creator inevitably came under fire when the nation paused to examine itself beginning in the nineteenth century. In his "Commentary on Poor Richard's Almanack," included in The Autobiography and Other Writings, Frank Donovan declares that "The Way to Wealth" generated "a mistaken image of [Franklin] that was passed down to posterity" – that of a "priggish, parsimonious money grubber." Donovan assails that view as entirely false, arguing that Franklin spurned untold riches by refusing to patent his inventions, doing so because he felt that "any invention which benefited his fellow man should be made available for the public good." While Franklin attracted his share of personal criticism in the century following his death, his creed evoked a harsher judgment. Barbour discusses a long-running tradition of rebuke for the capitalist principles incarnated by Poor Richard and complemented by the rags to riches story told in the Autobiography. He begins with the transcendentalist writings of Ralph Waldo Emerson, remarking that "it is possible to say that [Emerson's] whole career was a quarrel with the Franklinian spirit and the Franklinian dream." Moreover, Barbour explains that "what [Emerson] saw and feared in the Franklinian outlook was not just acquisitiveness but moral complacency, a satisfaction with the ordinary self, apparently validated by economic achievement." Franklin's most scornful and well-known critic, however, was British novelist D.H. Lawrence. With his passionate refrain that "the soul of man is a dark, vast forest," Lawrence launched a scathing attack on Franklin's "dreary theme" of human perfectibility in Studies in Classic American Literature (excerpted by Barbour). Lawrence reflects that "it has taken me many years and countless smarts to get out of that barbed wire moral enclosure that Poor Richard rigged up." With a brazen "loud curse against Benjamin and the American corral," he offers alternatives to thirteen of Richard's soul-binding adages. On sexuality, for instance, whereas Richard says, "Rarely use venery but for health and offspring," Lawrence responds, "Never 'use' venery at all. Follow your passional impulse, if it be answered in the other being." Lawrence accused Franklin of reducing the human spirit to a level of triteness, exploiting God as "the everlasting [John] Wanamaker," and setting Him "aloft on a pillar of dollars." Though failing to give Franklin credit for his many thought-provoking passages, Lawrence did expose the general shortcomings of Richard's pithy adages. Indeed, these are at times pragmatic to a fault, lacking a sense of passion and individualism. In the final analysis, however, Poor Richard's contributions must be taken in context. With his timeless wit, Franklin brought comfort and inspiration to a populace in its infancy, one struggling to gain an economic foothold and a sense of self. While the Almanack grew and changed over the years, Poor Richard remained steadfast in his homage to the common folk, exalting their everyday toils while inviting them to laugh at themselves in the process. He was thus clearly right for the times. The revulsion that later erupted toward the Franklinian creed likewise marked a healthy progression in the nation's growth, a time for reassessing values. That Americans still enjoy the intellectual freedom to argue their convictions – and to laugh at themselves in the process – bespeaks the blessings of a culture upon which Poor Richard made his mark. 2. Read the poem below and decide how to translate NEVERMORE into Russian. THE RAVEN
Once upon a midnight dreary, while I pondered, weak and weary, Only this, and nothing more." Ah, distinctly I remember it was in the bleak December, Nameless here for evermore.
And the silken sad uncertain rustling of each purple curtain
Presently my soul grew stronger; hesitating then no longer,
Deep into that darkness peering, long I stood there wondering, fearing, Merely this, and nothing more.
Back into the chamber turning, all my soul within me burning,
Open here I flung the shutter, when, with many a flirt and flutter,
Then this ebony bird beguiling my sad fancy into smiling,
Much I marvelled this ungainly fowl to hear discourse so plainly,
But the raven, sitting lonely on the placid bust, spoke only
Startled at the stillness broken by reply so aptly spoken,
But the Raven still beguiling all my fancy into smiling,
This I sat engaged in guessing, but no syllable expressing
Then methought the air grew denser, perfumed from an unseen censer
"Prophet!" said I, "thing of evil!- prophet still, if bird or devil!-
"Prophet!" said I, "thing of evil- prophet still, if bird or devil!
"Be that word our sign in parting, bird or fiend," I shrieked, upstarting-
And the Raven, never flitting, still is sitting, still is sitting __________________________________________________________________
READ MORE – FOREVER MORE! – ABOUT THE ABOVE AUTHORS IN:
1. Brodey, K. Malgaretti, F. Focus on English and American Literature. – M.: Айрис-пресс, 2003.
2. Gower, P. Past and Present. An Anthology of British and American Literature. – Longman, 1995.
Дата добавления: 2014-01-05; Просмотров: 316; Нарушение авторских прав?; Мы поможем в написании вашей работы! Нам важно ваше мнение! Был ли полезен опубликованный материал? Да | Нет |