Strong Verbs and their Development

According to morphological classif -Strong and Weak Verbs in Comparison

Voice, Aspect, Order, Posteriority

Mood(indicative.imperative,subjunctive),

Gfammatical classificTense2(pr. Past),

Person(1,2,3)consistently was shown only in the pres ind mood sg,in the past sg of the ind mood, the 1 &3 p coincided & the 2 p had a distinct form., p was not distinguished in the pl,&in the sudjunctive mood,

Number(sg&pl),

Basis for Comparison	Strong Verbs	Weak Verbs
Number
Type/Origin	Indo-European (reveals suppletivity)	Germanic (reveals dental suffix)
Formation of Past Tense forms	by changing the root-vowel (ablaut): s i ttan (Infinitive) – s æ t (Past Indefinite) (verb “to sit”)	with the help of the dental suffix -t/-d: līcian (Infinitive) – līco d e (Past Indefinite) (verb “to like”)
Formation of Participle2 forms	with the help of the suffix –en(+ sometimes root-vowel interchange): f i ndan (Infinitive) – f u nd en (Participle 2) (verb “to find”)	with the help of the dental suffix -t/-d: cēpan (Infinitive) – cēpe d (Participle 2) (verb “to keep”)
Derivation	Strong verbs were root-words /non-derivatives (i.e. they were not derived from some other words/roots but were the words/roots from which other words were derived)	Weak verbs were derivatives from nouns, adjectives, strong verbs: tellan (to tell) ← talu (a tale) fyllan (to fill) ← fyll (full) fandian (to find out) ← findan (to find)
Productivity	unproductive type (no new words employed this type of form-building)	productive type (new words that appeared employed this type of form-building)
Principle Forms	Infinitive Past Sg Past Pl Participle 2 wrītan – wrāt – writon – writen	Infinitive Past Sg Participle 2 cēpan – cēpte – cēped
Classes	subdivided into 7 classes	subdivided into 3 classes

1. As far as the strong verbs were a non-productive class, some strong verbs turned into weak with time, i.e. started to employ -t/-d suffix in their form-building (e.g. to climb, to help, to swallow, to wash, etc.). Thus in NE only 70 strong verbs out of 300 in OE remained.

2. The strong verbs were subdivided into 7 classes according to the type of vowel gradation/ablaut.

The classes that survived best through different periods of the history were classes 1, 3, 6:

Class 1	Infinitive	Past Sg	Past Pl	Participle 2
OE	wrītan	wrāt	writon	writen
ME	writen	wrot	writen	writen
NE	write	wrote	written

Class 3	Infinitive	Past Sg	Past Pl	Participle 2
OE	findan	fand	fundon	funden
ME	finden	fand	founden	founden
NE	find	found	found

Class 6	Infinitive	Past Sg	Past Pl	Participle 2
OE	scacan	scoc	scōcon	scacen
ME	shaken	shook	shoken	shaken
NE	shake	shook	shaken

Analysing the tables above, we can see that the following changes [A39] occurred:

· In ME the inflections - an, -on, -en were all reduced to just one inflection à - en.

· In NE the ending -n was lost in the Infinitive and preserved in the Participle 2 in order to distinguish these two forms.

· In NE Past Singular and Past Plural forms were unified, usually with the Singular form preferred as a unified form because Past Plural and Participle 2 often had similar forms and it was hard to distinguish them (e.g. ME writen (Past Pl) – writen (Part. 2))à the category of Number disappeared in the Verb.

In ModE the subdivision into classes was lost though we still can trace some peculiarities of this or that class in the forms of the irregular verbs.

Дата добавления: 2014-01-06