Evolution of historical-legal cognisance (problems of the subject and the

CONTENTS

Возможно ли новое направление правового знания в свете

В ПОСТИЖЕНИИ ПРАВА

ФИЛОСОФСКО-ИСТОРИЧЕСКИЙ ДИСКУРС

философско-исторического осмысления и нужно ли оно?)..............................................................................157

4.1. История права и философия истории: проблемы соотношения......................................................159

4.1.1. Философия истории: проблематика....................................................................................................................159

4.1.2. История права и философия истории................................................................................................................162

4.2. Философия права, философия истории и философско-историческое

осмысление права..............................................................................................................................163

4.3. Необходимое звено - историософия права.......................................................................................165

4.4. Дисциплинарный статус исгориософии права..................................................................................169

ЭПИСТЕМОЛОГИЯ КАК ОБЛАСТЬ ПОИСКА ОСНОВАНИЙ НАУКИ,

ЕЕ СТРУКТУРА И НЕОБХОДИМОСТЬ В ПРАВОВЕДЕНИИ

(вместо заключения).......................................................................................................................................................172

SUMMARY........................................................................................................................................................................175

БИБЛИОГРАФИЯ.............................................................................................................................................................176

СОДЕРЖАНИЕ...............................................................................................................................................................197

СОNТЕNТS.....................................................................................................................................................................199

HISTORICAL-LEGAL COGNISANCE: INTRODUCTION TO THE PROBLEM..................................................................3

structure of historical-legal science in historical cut).........................................................................................13

1.1. At the outset of knowledge of historical - legal knowledge......................................................................15

1.1.1. The origin of historical - legal knowledge (pre-history of historical-legal science)................................................15

1.1.2. The beginning of scientific- historical study of law. Conceptual premises (philosophical-historical

and theoretical - legal) of the rise of the history-legal science.................................................................................18

1.2. The completion of the process of establishment of historical-legal science and its later

development in XIX - the beginning of XX centuries.................................................................................30

1.2.1. The historidal school of law and further development of historical-legal science in Western Europe....................30

1.2.2. The establishment and development of historical-legal science in Russia. The problems of historical –

legal science in the works of Russian scientists in history of law............................................................................40

1.3. The peculiarities of historical-legal science in the XX century..................................................................48

1.3.1. The Western historical-legal science........................................................................................................................49

1.3.2. Soviet (Marxist) and post-Soviet historical-legal science.......................................................................................53

THE BASIS AND THE BOUNDARIES OF THE SUBJECT OF

HISTORICAL-LEGAL COGNISANCE....................................................................................................................60

2.1. Theoretical premises of defining the subject of historical-legal cognisance.............................................60

2.1.1. The object and the subject of scientific cognizance (science): general scientific aspect....................................................67

2.1.2. The problem of the so-called dualism in the object of legal science in the context

of an object as a system...........................................................................................................................................67

2.1.3. The historical study of a state as an integral part of a complex science of state.....................................................73

2.2.The general characteristics of an object and a subject of historical-legal cognisance..............................77

2.2.1. Does law really have no history of its own? The object of historical-legal cognisance...........................................77

2.2.2. The generalised characteristics of the subject of historical-legal cognisance..........................................................86

2.3. The epistemological situation in modern historiography and the problems of

an object and a subject of historical-legal cognisance............................................................................95

2.3.1. The general view of the modern historiographic situation....…...............................................................................96

2.3.2. The "Annals", discussions about "territory" of history and historical-legal science................................................99

2.3.3. The possibilities of anthropologisation in legal

comprehension and a subject field of historical-legal cognisance..........................................................................104

2.3.4. The post-modernist historiographic discourse: problems

and challenges.........................................................................................................................................................108

2.3.5. The subject field of historical-legal cognisance in the light

of methodological pluralism: multidimentional model of an object......................................................................115

2.4. Temporal boundaries of the subject of historical-legal science..............................................................119

DISCIPLINARY AREAS FOR HISTORICAL-LEGAL COGNISANCE..................................................................124

3.1. The disciplinary structure of historical-legal cognisance and knowledge:

general characteristics...........................................................................................................................124

3.2. The history of law as a science - a core of the historical-legal cognisance............................................128

3.2.1. The subjective peculiarities of history of law as a science...............................................................................................128

3.2.2. The image of universal history of law as a science................................................................................................132

3.2.2.1. Philosophical and historical views on the problem......................................................................................................132

3.2.2.2. The views of professional historians of law..................................................................................................................134

3.2.2.3. The experience of I. Kohler's 'universal history of law …............................................................................................136

3.2.2.4. Differentiation between such notions as "the world history" and "the universal history" (N.T. Granovskiy)...................139

3.2.2.5. Universal history of law - the model of theoretical history oflaw............................................................................................140

3.3. Subjective field of historical self-reflection in jurisprudence....................................................................142

3.3.1. Legal science as an area of historical study. Problems of the subject and objectives

of the history of legal science..................................................................................................................................143

3.3.1.1. On the role and modern stage of development of the history oflegalscience...........................................................................143

3.3.1.2. On the history of comprehension of the subject of the history of legal science.......................................................................145

3.3.1.3. The object and the subject of the history of legal science.........................................................................................................147

3.3.1.4. The main objectives and directions of research in the framework of the history of legal science...........................................149

3.3.2. The subjective peculiarities of the history of legal thoughts..…............................................................................151

Дата добавления: 2015-05-10