The psychology of cultural Marxists

An alternative instead of a complete removal of the discipline of sociology from academia

Apolitical sociologists

Political sociologists

Offices infiltrated by sociologists (or individuals who has a sociology major):

Public administrative positions (usually government and public agencies that administer human services).

Sectors heavily infiltrated with individuals who have taken a sociology degree/courses in sociology:

Census analyst
Community organizer
Consultant
Criminal justice planner
Demographer
Diversity related professions

Health and Family Planning

Interviewer
Jury Consultant

Labour relations
Law enforcement officer
Market researcher
Mediator
Military

Ministry
Non-profit Organizations (leaders)

NGOs (leaders)

Personnel Management

Planning Departments in various agencies

Politics

Population analyst
Public opinion pollster
Publishing - editing, research and sales

Prisons

Psychiatric social worker
Recreation worker
Researcher
Rural sociologist
School social worker
Social services volunteer coordinator
Social worker
Sociology professor
State and Local Agencies

Substance abuse counsellor
Teaching and counselling - high school, college, university

Training and development

Sociology bachelor’s degree as background for graduate school in:

Journalism
Law
Medicine
Divinity School
Education
Political Science
Economics
Business Administration

A small minority of sociologists are not considered traitors as they are apolitical.

Instead of destroying the discipline of sociology by removing it, an alternative approach is to completely reform it; replacing the Marxist ideological view with a conservative/anti-Marxist by instead using ideological fundaments from the following works/authors;

The Bible

Machiavelli
George Orwell

Thomas Hobbes

John Stuart Mill

John Locke

Adam Smith

Edmund Burke

Ayn Rand

William James

“An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last.”

Winston Churchill

One of the most widespread manifestations of the craziness of our world is multiculturalism, so a discussion of the psychology of multiculturalists can serve as an introduction to the discussion of the problems of Western Europe in general.

But what is multiculturalism or Cultural Communism? The movement is fragmented and it is not clear who can properly be called a cultural Marxist. When we speak of cultural Marxists in this article we have in mind mainly individuals who support multiculturalism; socialists, collectivists, "politically correct" types, feminists, gay and disability activists, animal rights activists, environmentalists etc. But not everyone who is associated with one of these movements support multiculturalism. What we are trying to get at in discussing cultural Marxists is not so much a movement or an ideology as a psychological type, or rather a collection of related types.

Our conception of cultural Marxists will remain a good deal less clear than we would wish, but there doesn't seem to be any remedy for this. All we are trying to do is indicate in a rough and approximate way the two psychological tendencies that we believe are the main driving force of modern multiculturalism. We by no means claim to be telling the WHOLE truth about cultural Marxist psychology. Also, our discussion is meant to apply to modern cultural Marxists only.

The two psychological tendencies that underlie cultural Marxists we call "feelings of inferiority" and "over-socialisation." Feelings of inferiority are characteristic of cultural Marxism as a whole, while over-socialisation is characteristic only of a certain segment of cultural Marxism; but this segment is highly influential.

Дата добавления: 2015-05-31