Архитектура-(3434)Астрономия-(809)Биология-(7483)Биотехнологии-(1457)Военное дело-(14632)Высокие технологии-(1363)География-(913)Геология-(1438)Государство-(451)Демография-(1065)Дом-(47672)Журналистика и СМИ-(912)Изобретательство-(14524)Иностранные языки-(4268)Информатика-(17799)Искусство-(1338)История-(13644)Компьютеры-(11121)Косметика-(55)Кулинария-(373)Культура-(8427)Лингвистика-(374)Литература-(1642)Маркетинг-(23702)Математика-(16968)Машиностроение-(1700)Медицина-(12668)Менеджмент-(24684)Механика-(15423)Науковедение-(506)Образование-(11852)Охрана труда-(3308)Педагогика-(5571)Полиграфия-(1312)Политика-(7869)Право-(5454)Приборостроение-(1369)Программирование-(2801)Производство-(97182)Промышленность-(8706)Психология-(18388)Религия-(3217)Связь-(10668)Сельское хозяйство-(299)Социология-(6455)Спорт-(42831)Строительство-(4793)Торговля-(5050)Транспорт-(2929)Туризм-(1568)Физика-(3942)Философия-(17015)Финансы-(26596)Химия-(22929)Экология-(12095)Экономика-(9961)Электроника-(8441)Электротехника-(4623)Энергетика-(12629)Юриспруденция-(1492)Ядерная техника-(1748)
Q: Who is your favourite contemporary author and why?
Q: Why don’t you mention the liberation of the US (from multiculturalism, suicidal humanism and Islamisation) in your book?
Q: Which individual or organisation deserves the Nobel Peace Prize?
Q: Any advice to a future cultural conservative tribunal/government?
A: Most aspects are already covered in the compendium. Implementing a cultural conservative agenda is essential but don’t go overboard with the changes in a short amount of time. Be patient and don’t let short term impatience or greed be your undoing. Learn from past mistakes. Sometimes it’s best to seek a gradual transformation rather than turning everything upside down too quickly. The goal is to create a long term and sustainable cultural conservative society which often will require you to make unfavourable short term concessions. Use strategic populism for what it’s worth and be careful not to rob people of too many freedoms.
A:As some of us already know, the Nobel Institute is controlled by the EUSSR/USASSR criminal hegemony. I would probably award it to someone who fights hate ideologies like multiculturalism (European hate-ideology), as very few are aware of the true nature of this under-analyzed political model.
A:It is not our place to dictate or tell our European-American brothers and sisters what to do or not do. Whatever they decide, we Europeans will support them 100%. But of course, we are aware that they are in a somewhat similar situation. The democrats are supporting mass-Muslim immigration for the votes, while the Republicans want cheap labour. They do not have any political party at all representing them. However, we know that they are monitoring the European situation closely and are thus likely to respond based on our course of action. When the traitor government in France falls within the next seven decades it will act as a domino effect which might also result in an American right wing coup.
A:That would be Fjordman.Despite a couple of attempts, I have not been able to meet with him even though he is Norwegian. He is quite paranoid which is understandable to a certain degree I guess.Many have asked if I am Fjordman, but this is obviously not the case. To be honest, I had no idea who he was until I was six months into my current compendium, “2083”. At that time I had researched most of the primary and secondary topics for my book. To my great surprise I found that Fjordman had written about many of the same topics I was writing about. The only difference being that he was a professional essay writer and I was not. Our views are quite similar with the exception of me being an actual armed resistance fighter. I had researched hundreds of writers in the past, many of whom are good. However, I really felt a connection to Fjordmans essays. He is most likely the most talented right wing essay writer in Europe. Another factor that separates him from everyone else is that he really wants to contribute. He writes because he really wants to contribute to change Europe, unlike many other right wing intellectuals who are more concerned about feeding their egos. I have the impression that some are opportunists who simply want to milk the cow for as long as possible. People that really want change will not trademark their work indefinitely but instead see that their intellectual works are distributed to as many Europeans as possible on as many languages as possible. This is not possible as long as the authors on the field trademark their intellectual work and do whatever they can to limit the distribution. I can understand that they need to earn enough for food and rent etc. However, if they want to make a real difference instead of being viewed as “intellectual war profiteers and opportunists” they will have to contribute by making their intellectual property available for all Europeans. We are in the middle of the war and many of them are not contributing as much as they could.
Fjordman and every writer out there who makes their intellectual work available for distribution will be viewed as valuable contributors and they will be remembered as heroes of the conservative revolutionary movement. Obviously, everyone should have the opportunity to make a profit, which is why I have suggested to many that they release their works on two arenas. On one hand, they can sell their products as usual, while still allowing the armed European Resistance Movement to distribute their works freely, without legally persecuting everyone who does.
Дата добавления: 2015-05-31; Просмотров: 107; Нарушение авторских прав?;