Lecture 5

⇐ Предыдущая 6 7 8 9 101112 13 Следующая ⇒

Geopolitical interests of Kazakhstan in OIC

Radical transformation

Islamization in Islamic world

The Representatives of the RK in SMID OIC and national interests

Additional organs (membership to them without fail for the members of OIC) Center of Statistical, Economical and Social Research of Islamic States(Ankara), Center Research of Islamic History, Art and Culture (Istanbul), Islamic Technology Institute(Dakar), Islamic Center of Trade Development(Casablanca), Islamic Academy of Law(Jidda),Executive Bureau of Islamic Fund of Solidarity (Jidda)

Plan of seminar

The Secretary General of the OIC

1. Tunku Abdul Rahman (Malaysia): (1971-1973)

2. Hassan Al-Touhami (Egypt): (1974-1975)

3. Dr. Amadou Karim Gaye (Senegal): (1975-1979)

4. Habib Chatty (Tunisia): (1979-1984)

5. Syed Sharifuddin Pirzada (Pakistan): (1985-1988)

6. Dr. Hamid Algabid (Niger): (1989-1996)

7. Dr. Azeddine Laraki (Morocco): (1997-2000)

8. Dr. Abdelouahed Belkeziz (Morocco): (2001-2004)

9. Dr. Ekmeleddin İhsanoğlu (Turkey): (2005 to present)

IWS questions:

Key questions:

1. How does the representative of Kazakhstan in OIC reflect the image of country on international arena?

2. Kazakhstan and OIC: Positive and negative sides of cooperation with organization?

Geopolitical collision of CA: evolution of interests of foreign force and questions of regional security of the region

All countries of Central Asia—Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan—

inherited elements of the vast Soviet weapons of mass destruction (WMD) production

complex. Among the activities in which WMD facilities in Central Asia were engaged were

uranium mining, plutonium production, the fabrication and testing of biological and chemical

weapons, and the storage and testing of nuclear weapons. Early international efforts to address this

proliferation threat emphasized ensuring that the Russian Federation became the only legatee of

Soviet nuclear weapons; other proliferation risks posed by WMD materials, technology and expertise

received less attention.

Materials that currently pose WMD-related threats in Central Asia can be classified into three

main groups: nuclear weapon-related material, including fissile material (highly enriched uranium and

plutonium) and radioactive material ("orphan", or abandoned, sources); biological weapon-related

materials and technologies; and chemical weapon-related materials and technologies. The leading

WMD-related risk in Central Asia is the possibility of the theft of materials and their sale by smugglers

or through brokers to terrorist or proliferant states. Another risk is the leakage of expertise either

through the sale of critical information or through "brain drain". A related risk is the possibility that

Central Asian states could be used as a transit corridor for smuggling WMD-related materials and

expertise originating from outside of the region.

⇐ Предыдущая 6 7 8 9 101112 13 Следующая ⇒

Поделиться с друзьями:

Дата добавления: 2015-05-09; Просмотров: 375; Нарушение авторских прав?; Мы поможем в написании вашей работы!

Нам важно ваше мнение! Был ли полезен опубликованный материал? Да | Нет

studopedia.su - Студопедия (2013 - 2024) год. Все материалы представленные на сайте исключительно с целью ознакомления читателями и не преследуют коммерческих целей или нарушение авторских прав! Последнее добавление

Генерация страницы за: 0.007 сек.