Stylistic use of intonation. 1. Speak on linguistic and extra-linguistic factors

CHECK YOURSELF

Questions and tasks:

1. Speak on linguistic and extra-linguistic factors. What is the
difference between them?

2. How did phonostylistics come into existence?

3. What does the term "phonostylistics" suggest?

4. Speak on the status of phonostylistics.

5. Why is there no general theory of phonostylistics so far?

6. What is the essential characteristic of phonostylistics?

7. Give a definition of the phonetic norm.

8. What is the correlation between the norms and the actual
speech behaviour used?

9. Give examples of phonetic synonyms.

10.What is the scope of euphonology? Why is it important?

11.Speak on sound symbolism. Give examples of your own.

12.Give examples of stylistic devices conveyed by phonetic expressive means.

13.Why does a person speak differently on different occasions?

Key words and expressions:

stylistic differentiation, conventional patterns, intonation system, invariant basis, lexical and grammatical meanings, verbal context, co-occur­ring situational information, non-verbal context, informational (formal) style, scientific (academic) style, declamatory style, familiar (conversational) style, prepared and spontaneous speech, spoken and written language, monologue, dialogue, quasi-spontaneous speech, public and nоn - pub1ic speech, formal and informal speech

Intonation plays a central role in stylistic differentiation of oral texts. Stylistically explicable deviations from intonational norms reveal conventional patterns differing from language to language. Adult speakers are both transmitters and receivers of the same range of phonostylistic effects carried by intonation. The intonation system of a language provides a consistently rec­ognizable invariant basis of these effects from person to person.

The use of intonation in this function show that the informa­tion conveyed so is, in many cases, impossible to separate from lexical and grammatical meanings expressed by words and con­structions in a language (verbal context) and from the co-occur­ring situational information (non-verbal context). The meaning of intonation cannot be judged in isolation. However, intonation does not usually correlate in any neat one-for-one way with the verbal context accompanying and the situational variables in an extra-linguistic context. Moreover, the perceived contrast with the intonation of the previous utterance seems to be relevant. In the following example a connecting phrase in the appropriate intonation conditions the stylistic force of the accompanying sentence, and contrasts with the 'literal' meaning of the words:

You 'KNOW | I think he's ֻRIGHT (= let me tell you, I think...)

You ֻKNOW I think he's right (= you are aware that I think...)

One of the objectives of phonostylistics is the study of intonational functional styles. An intonational style can be defined as a system of interrelated intonational means which is used in a certain social sphere and serves a definite aim in communication.

The problem of intonational styles classification can hardly be regarded as settled as yet. We distinguish the following five style categories:

(1) informational (formal) style;

(2) scientific (academic) style;

(3) declamatory style;

(4) publicistic style;

(5) familiar (conversational) style.

The situational context and the speaker's purpose determine the choice of an intonational style. The primary situational determinant is the kind of relationship existing between the participants in a communicative transaction.

Intonational styles distinction is based on the assumption that there are three types of information present in communication:

(b) intellectual information;

(c) emotional and attitudinal, (modal) information;

(d) volitional and desiderative information.

Consequently, there are three types of intonation patterns used in oral communication:

(a) intonation patterns used for intellectual purposes;

(b) intonation patterns used for emotional and attitudinal purposes;

(c) intonation patterns used for volitional and desiderative purposes.

All intonational styles include intellectual intonation patterns, because the aim of any kind of intercourse is to communicate or express some intellectual information. The frequency of occurrence and the overall intonational distribution of emotional (or attitudinal) and volitional (or desiderative) pat­terns shape the distinctive features of each style.

Informational (formal) style is characterised by the predomi­nant use of intellectual intonation patterns. It occurs in formal discourse where the task set by the sender of the message is to communicate information without giving it any emotional or vo­litional evaluation. This intonational style is used, for instance, by radio and television announcers when reading weather fore­casts, news, etc, or in various official situations. It is considered to be stylistically neutral.

In scientific (academic) style intellectual and volitional (or desiderative) intonation patterns are concurrently employed. The speaker's purpose here is not only to prove a hypothesis, to create new concepts, to disclose relations between different phe­nomena, etc., but also to direct the listener's attention to the message carried in the semantic component. Although this style tends to be objective and precise, it is not entirely unemotional and devoid of any individuality. Scientific intonational style is frequently used, for example, by university lecturers, school­teachers, or by scientists in formal and informal discussions.

In declamatory style the emotional role of intonation increas­es, thereby intonation patterns used for intellectual, volitional and emotional purposes have an equal share. The speaker's aim is to appeal simultaneously to the mind, the will and feelings of the listener by image-bearing devices. Declamatory style is gen­erally acquired by special training and it is used, for instance, in stage speech, classroom recitation, verse - speaking or in reading aloud fiction.

Publicistic style is characterised by predominance of volition­al (or desiderative) intonation patterns against the background of intellectual and emotional ones. The general aim of this intona­tional style is to exert influence on the listener, to convince him that the speaker's interpretation is the only correct one and to cause him to accept the point of view expressed in the speech. The task is accomplished not merely through logical argumentation but through persuasion and emotional appeal. For this reason publicistic style has features in common with scientific style on the one hand, and declamatory style, on the other. As distinct from the latter its persuasive and emotional appeal is achieved not by the use of imagery but in a more direct manner. Publicistic style is made resort to by political speech-makers, radio and television commentators, participants of press conferenc­es and interviews, counsel and judges in courts of law, etc.

The usage of familiar (conversational) style is typical of the English of everyday life. It occurs both within a family group and in informal external relationships, namely, in the speech of intimate friends or well-acquainted people. In such cases it is the emotional reaction to a situational or verbal stimulus that matters, thereby the attitude- and emotion-signalling function of in­tonation here comes to the fore. Nevertheless intellectual and volitional intonation patterns also have a part to play. In informal fluent discourse there are examples of utterance where the effect of intellectual intonation is neutralized, e.g.:

MARY:...I can live like other people, make my own decisions, decide for myself what I should or shouldn't do!

MACFEE: Aye.

MARY (ecstatically): Oh its ֻWONDERFUL, | ֻMARVELLOUS, |

`HEAVENLY, | DE -LIGHTFLUL!

(P. Ableman. "Blue Comedy”)

Analysis of most varieties of English speech shows that the intonational styles in question occur alternately (fusion of styles). For example, a university lecturer can make use of both scientific style (definitions, presentation of scientific facts) and declamatory style (an image-bearing illustration of these definiions and facts).

Moreover, intonational styles contrastivity is explicable only within the framework of speech typology, embracing primarily (a) varieties of language, (b) forms of communication, (c) degree of speech preparedness, (d) the number of participants involved in communication, (e) the character of participants' relationship.

Language in its full interactional context has two varieties - spoken and written. The term 'spoken' is used in relation to oral texts produced by unconstrained speaking, while the term 'written' is taken to cover both oral representation of written texts (reading) and the kind of English that we sometime hear in the language of public speakers and orators, or possibly in formal conversation (more especially between strangers). Since the spoken and the written varieties may have an oral form the term 'oral text' is applicable to both. According to the nature of the participation situation in which the speaker is involved two forms of communication are generally singled out — monologue and dialogue, the former being referred to as a one-sided type of conversation and the latter as a balanced one.

Degree of speech preparedness entails distinction between prepared and spontaneous speech. Sometimes quasi-spontaneous speech is being distinguished.

As far as the number of participants involved in communica­tion is concerned, speech may be public and nоn - pub1ic. And, finally, from the character of participants' relationship viewpoint there are formal and informal types of speech.

Thus, an intonational style is a many-faceted phenomenon and in describing, for example, the intonational identity of famil­iar (conversational) style one has to take into account that it oc­curs in the spoken variety of English, both in one-sided (mono­logue) and balanced (dialogue) types of conversation, in sponta­neous, non-public, informal discourse.

Дата добавления: 2015-05-31